Screening for studies in systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other knowledge syntheses: Strategies for improvement
- Event Type:
- Tue Aug 10, 2021 at 1:00 PM to 4:00 PM
Have you ever experienced challenges when screening for studies in a systematic review, a scoping review, or other knowledge synthesis study? Join this session to learn strategies on improving your screening process and working better on a review team.
In this session, participants will be able to:
- Recognize the importance of alignment between the eligibility criteria developed in the protocol when screening
- Understand the importance of asking clarifying questions with the PI and review members to perform better screening.
- Describe the characteristics and importance of a well-defined eligibility (inclusion/exclusion) criteria.
- Identify issues and challenges associated with the study screening process.
- Discuss strategies to reduce screening conflicts and increase screening accuracy for first and second level of screening.
This workshop will NOT cover:
- Strategies for methods and review types other than knowledge syntheses (ex. literature or narrative reviews)
- The following knowledge syntheses cycle steps:
- How to create a protocol
- How to search for studies
- How to abstract data from studies
- How to synthesize studies
**This workshop is NOT on how to learn to use screening software solutions (e.g. Covidence, Rayyan, DistillerSR). If you want to learn how to use a software contact them directly to set up a demo, or look at their tutorials**
You will get the most out of this workshop if you understand:
- The methods and steps for your knowledge synthesis review type (systematic review, scoping review, rapid review, etc.)
- How to develop a focused research question and objective.
- What a protocol is and have developed one for a knowledge syntheses review.
- What inclusion and exclusion criteria are, screening conflicts, and what first and second level of screening is.
Note: Strategies learned in this workshop can be applied to any knowledge syntheses study in both the first level of screening (title and abstract) and second level of screening (full-text).
This workshop is exclusive to:
Current University of Toronto community members: Current students, faculty, and staff.
Participants must register on EVE using UTORid login.
- Learning Outcomes
By the end of the workshop, participants should be able to:
- Assess the alignment of eligibility criteria to the screening process in their own reviews.
- Develop well-defined eligibility criteria for the study screening process.
- Understand how screening guidance can be applied to any knowledge syntheses review.
- Integrate screening guidance strategies into a knowledge synthesis project.
Patricia Ayala, Research Services Librarian
Patricia has worked on the development of the Systematic and Scoping Review Collaboration (SSRC) at Gerstein Science Information Centre, focused on partnering with faculty and researchers engaged in systematic, scoping and other types of knowledge syntheses. Patricia’s portfolio includes building and deepening relationships with faculty, staff, students and other researchers, on campus, within research institutes, teaching hospitals, and national and international organizations. She was part of the team that developed PRISMA-Search a guideline on how to report literature searches, and most recently the Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances: The CONSERVE 2021 Statement. She has degrees in Biology and Fine Arts from the University of North Carolina, and Master in Information and Library Studies from the University of Toronto.
Amanda Yang, M.I.
Amanda supports the instruction, research, and consultations of systematic and scoping reviews at Gerstein Science Information Centre, serving researchers, graduate students, librarians, and faculty staff in the University of Toronto community. She is also involved in a team developing a COVID-19 Information Guide providing emerging research literature & data, government resources, key information for the general public and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in Justice, Political Philosophy & Law from McMaster University and currently studying a Masters of Information concentrating in Critical Information Policy at the University of Toronto’s iSchool.
- Seats Available In-Person
- Attendee Types
RegistrationRegistration is closed.
- Web-Conferencing Information
- You must have an Approved registration to this event to view this information.